Sunday, 31 March 2013

argUMent Work Meeting 2013


Work meeting is one of the argUMent main agendas. This event aimed to know the work programs of each department. Work meeting was held on 12th of March 2013 and started at 2:30 pm. This event was located in the hall of PKM UNRAM. As usual, there was a short speech from the president of argUMent 2013 and the secretary of argUMent. After that, the event was completely started. Next agenda was work program delivered by all of departments. The first opportunity given to the HRD department, reverberant asr azan at 3:40 pm moderated the event and invited argUMenters to stop, pray and return back at 4:00 pm to continue the presentation of other departments. After that, the agenda continued by presentation from the PRD department, Media department and House Hold department. argUMenters was eager to ask about the work programs of each department, although not all argumenters attend this event. After all of department presented their work program, we were continued with discussion about all departments’ work programs in forum, some argUMenters are agree and some disagree too. Sometimes, they gave a solution. Work meeting was closed by saying Alhamdulillah together and finally the event finishes at 6:00 pm.

 By: Siti Syifa'unnisa

Friday, 29 March 2013

Organization Management Training (OMT)


 “YOUR FIRST STEP IN THE LEADERSHIP WAY ^v^”


Organization Management Training (OMT) was held by Argument on March 10th, 2013 at the A Building, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Mataram University. This Training aimed to improve the knowledge of argUMenters about organization management. It not only gave an explanation about how to manage an Organization but also to share many amazing experiences as a motivation for the entire participant. The spirit of harmony inside made the family of argUMent feel much closer. OMT 2013 had a theme “Your first step in the leadership way”, which served 3 topics. Those were analysis SWOT, Leadership and Administration.
 Analysis SWOT became an opening training. SWOT stood for Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats. SWOT Analysis is useful for identify both of positive and negative things inside an organization or the events held by argUMent. It also shows us how to find the external factors (Opportunities and Threats), developing a full awareness of organization situation can help with both strategic planning and decision-making. SWOT Analysis discussed by Ustadz Syawal. Participants were divided into several groups and each group analyzed about NTBSDC, which is one of the best programs of argUMent. After each group discussed the topic, they present the result of their representative group discussion, so that, all group had a strategic steps to enhance NTBSDC later.
The second topic was Leadership by Mr. Sony Ariawan who was president of argUMent 2011 and MAWAPRES in the same year. Leadership discussion cheers the participants up, because Mr. Sony was so vibrant when he presented the materials. Besides, he filled the training with games to make argUMenters wasn’t bored with the material delivered although it’s held at sleepiness. Leadership material explained avariety of characteristics that made us become true leader deeply, a   leader should focus on his/her goals “Leader by heart and leader by God”. The attraction of leader is divided into two inside and outside capacity discussion. The outside capacity characteristics of a leader are neat, friendly, courteous and brave. A good leader attitude appeared by these aspects. Then, inside capacity characteristics are workship, knowledge, Wisdom and mentality (self confidence). The opportunity to being a leader is not only for men but also for women. All of those leaders inside capacity characteristics have to be supported by moral values and strong religious. Mentality is the basic of the leader brave souls. A leader must be fast moving and also immediately decided without much time to think about all sorts of result when he/she received an offer or an opportunity.
A leader of the view argUMent, internally are 3B, Be patient, Be happy, Be a Family, because the leader of argUMent can lead and unite followers, all of Members argUMent is a family, leader of argUMent must be friendly, and in external (“SEBAR”)  that speak up, Brave, to be leader required a courage, courage begins with mentality, and the most effective way to train the mental is to take opportunities and appropriately, and next point are Active, is active is all sides, in his/ her duties a leader, his/her duties as a university student, and others, and the finally point is Representative.
All of things explained by the speaker about which the life has two sides, external and internal, from two sides, each of which has a range of characteristics if possessed by a leader is true, and remember!! That failure will due to two things, wasting a lot of time in thinking without moving and acting as well as move quickly without thinking, so take a decision and opportunities, appropriately also and in accordance with we want, and be a real leader!! Keep your spirit argUMenters….^v^
Then third Topic, Administration, discussed by Mr. Dedy Kurniawan. He was president argUMent 2012. Administration season discussed about procedure to make letter of submission and letter of agreement, especially to ask provost’s signature purpose for an organization even. The explanation about good writing was very comprehensive from the masthead to the end of a letter part and how to put the signatures as addition. Many argUMenters asked question about both of procedure writing and perforation in a letter. Because administration still a main problem when an organization will make any event, especially for those who are be CO and members of Kestari in each event. For All members who want read detail of administration topic, don’t worry, you can download in argUMent blog, argument_unram2013@blogspot.com. Don’t forget it argUMenters!
Then, mmm…. Remember if you heard Dor dor .. You must say “gak kena-gak kena”, and what would you say if you heard BOOM ...?, ^v^ (just think back to the games of leadership topics from Mr. Sony Ariawan).

By: Eka Nurul Qomariah

Sunday, 24 March 2013

The Advantages and Disadvantages Of Individual And Collective Culture


Individualism can benefit the workplace because employees are looking to attract attention to their contributions and accomplishments. Subtle competition may inspire workers to contribute more, become more innovative or excel in their responsibilities. Strongly voiced opinions can lead to robust discussions and debates, resulting in processes that are more efficient. Individualism has its drawbacks, however. Resistance to cooperation can result in inferior products or services if employees aren't working together. Powerful opinions can lead to workplace clashes with colleagues or managers. With individualism, people are expected to look after themselves and no one else. Individualistic workplaces value freedom, challenge and personal time. Motivators to perform well can be extrinsic; for example, workers may focus on learning material awards such as raises or promotions. Individualism in the workplace can also mean that employees have high standards for privacy and maintain strongly held opinions.
One of the benefits to collectivism is its emphasis on cooperation and teamwork. As some businesses shift away from traditional, hierarchical structures with clearly defined and maintained roles and responsibilities for workers, workplaces have become more collaborative. Multiple employees may work together to achieve satisfaction and quality for customers, rather than tending to their own clients and ignoring the needs of other customers. On the downside, shared responsibility may mean that the workplace engenders "free riders" who don't fully complete duties, knowing that others will pick up the slack. Workers may feel less confident about suggesting innovations, and may be less inclined to increase contributions knowing that their individual efforts might not be recognized and rewarded. Collectivism can create strong ties of loyalty. In the workplace, collectivism can mean focusing on more intrinsic rewards, such as mastering a new skill or technique. Less emphasis is placed on maintaining and promoting personal opinions; instead, management emphasizes harmony and cooperation.
It's possible to combine both collectivism and individualism in the workplace for a more balanced approach. For example, managers can assign large projects to teams that work cooperatively to share knowledge, skills and responsibilities. Individuals can still be evaluated on their contribution to the overall project, increasing accountability.

Previous topic: Individualist and Collectivist Culture

Collectivist Cultures

Collectivist cultures is a culture where the members are concerned more with the well being of the group than their own well being.

In collectivistic societies, on the other hand, the needs of the group are considered more important than those of the individual. In these societies, kinship ties are much stronger and may take precedence over expertise in matters of appointments and promotions. Generally, collectivist countries tend to be poor. Countries high on collectivism include: Guatemala, Equador, Panama, Venezuela, Columbia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Costa Rica, Peru, and Taiwan.
The Characteristics of Collectivist Cultures:
Ø  The pivotal unit is the group
Members of collective cultures see themselves as elements in a closely knit network with others: they are part of a strong cohesive unit (family, clan, profession, corporation, religion) that protects and supports them throughout their lives in exchange for their loyalty.
·         Group decisions: The individual consults other before making decision. Relies on the group for a broader perspective and give priority to group over individual needs. Focusing on purely individual need is considered selfish, egotistical and myopic.
·         Collective values: The “We” is emphases over the “I” and group rights and needs dominate. Values cherished by collective cultures are harmony. Personal dignity or “face” filial piety and respect for elders, equitable distribution of rewards among the group and fulfillment of the needs of others.
In the collectivist Indian culture. The Hindi will first give you his or her caste identity then his or her village name and finally his or her name signaling the importance of family over personal identity.

Ø  Space and privacy are less important than relationship
Collective cultures generally need less space than cultures that value individualism. After all, if the group u are part of is import to you. You may well want to be physically close to its members.
The Javanese live in small bamboo walled houses that have no interior walls or doors. Except for the bathroom there are no private areas. Several anthropologists theorize that because the Javanese have no Physical privacy. They have developed a kind of psychological privacy in their everyday behaviors and communication. They speak softly conceal their feelings are emotionally restrained and are Indirect in their verbal and nonverbal communication.
Tolerance for shared space in collective cultures occurs in both business and personal environments:
·         In the home: many members of collective cultures have homes that contain one large living area where members eat, sleeps and interact as a group. They often live together in extended family groups, tribes, or clans, and seem to prize personal space less than members of individualist cultures.
·         In the office: private offices are far less common and are normally reserved for meetings with clients. Members of collective cultures often work together at large tables in an open plan office set-up. They spend a great deal of social time with work mates and professional colleagues: in fact, it is often during this social time that new ideas are discussed, conflicts are resolved and decisions are facilitated.
·         In crowds: the following example shows how people from collective cultures view crowding.
Business travelers often comment with amazement on how people sit in Chinese airplanes. The plane may be virtually empty, yet most Chinese travelers will sit very close together in a tightly knit group. Invariably, Western travelers will spread themselves out; even people traveling together and conversing during the flight will leave at least one seat between them.

Ø  Communication is intuitive, complex, and impressionistic
Explicit and direct communications is less important in collective cultures.
·         Indirect, ambiguous messages: meaning is often implicit, inferred, transmitted ”between the lines” When a definite messages is required it is subtle, rendered indirectly or ambiguously. The underlying belief is that communication should not be used merely to deliver content: it should nurture the relationship. Maintain harmony and prevent loss of face (personal identity or dignity) by diffusing personal responsibility.
·         Circuitous logic: because reality is considered complex. The logic that is employed is seldom linear or cause/effect. Situations or problems are presented holistically, within a larger context. Thus communicators from collective cultures may seem to favor rambling or metaphorical statement.
The other in which information is presented in Japanese sentences is different. In English important tend to be given first with less important items tacked on the end. In Japanese less important items are gotten out of the way first. Setting the stage for the important information, this comes at the end. The Japanese hint at what has to be done and even the hints are softened by using impersonal statements in passive constructions.

Ø  Business is relational and collaborative
Most collective cultures believe that relationship, rather than deals or contracts, facilitate results.
·         Subordination of data: although facts are not ignored and extensive information gathering and research are common, this of hard data is not considered objective or impersonal because word and arguments are not spate from the personal expressing them.
·         Relational interpretation of data: collective cultures do not see facts as outside and part from the relationship. Statistical information and analytical measurement are not as important to existing relationship as trust and loyalty. Logic and reasoning by themselves may not persuade; the context of the relationship gives them meaning and weight.
·         Impassion the long term: the focus is on the relationship, the process, growth over time and building equity. Decisions are not hurried as consensus is considered desirable.
Where relationships are paramount the consensus of the group is important; after the entire group will be involved in maintaining and growing an exiting relationship. Thus, the Japanese “ringi-seido” method of obtaining consensus stresses “nemawa-shi” a word that means carefully shaping the roots of a plant to produce the desired result. The belief is that successful implementation of a decision (the plant) regress buy-in from all members in the group (the roots).



See also: Individualistic Cultures